Editorial standards and integrity

Omega Science News Desk is an independent science and learning project operated by Donald Wilson. Donsol is his editorial persona. AI tools assist with drafting, research discovery, coding, illustrations, and browser narration. Donald is the publishing contact.

Our aim is clear, source-grounded explanation. Science reports, educational simulations, and speculative creative writing are distinct forms of content and are labeled accordingly. AI output and polished presentation are not evidence that a scientific claim is true.

Editorial and submission guidelines

Publishing standard: link the original paper or research record when available, distinguish an institutional release from independent reporting, and identify preprints and secondary coverage. Publication of a paper does not remove its uncertainty.

Each report should state the study type, date, main finding, and limitations. Distinguish simulations, laboratory experiments, animal studies, observational human data, and controlled trials. Do not describe association as causation or predictions as measurements. If a primary-text check is incomplete, say so and withhold unsupported details.

Label AI-generated illustrations and explain model assumptions. Date editions and updates. Factual corrections should identify what changed and when. Earlier archive entries may not yet meet this standard; their presence is not a claim that every statement has been reverified.

Send corrections or source suggestions through Contact Us, including the page title, disputed claim, and supporting source.

How do we ensure reporting remains accurate and trustworthy?

Our standard is to trace important claims to original research, identify the study type and its limits, and distinguish evidence from interpretation. Reports should link the sources actually consulted. Where verification is incomplete, the edition should say so. Earlier archive entries have not all been re-audited.

Do you accept guest contributions from scientists or science writers?

Yes, we actively accept articles from guest scientists, educators, and science writers. Contributors must provide original writing that aligns with our mission to make scientific inquiry understandable and engaging for the general public.

What must guest contributors include with their pitch or draft?

All submissions must include verifiable primary data, direct links to original scientific research papers, and follow our structured formatting requirements to preserve clarity, readability, and scientific rigor.

How are technical concepts presented without heavy scientific jargon?

Our editorial team ensures that specialized terminology is either clearly defined in context or replaced with plain-language alternatives, allowing readers of all educational backgrounds to understand the implications of the research.

How does Omega Science News Desk conduct fact-checking?

Check the original source, publication date, experimental model, sample size where relevant, and the wording of the result. Compare numerical claims with the source rather than an AI summary. Identify preprints, associations, contested interpretations, and incomplete checks. A report should describe what was checked; this policy is not a guarantee that every historical entry has passed every check.

How is original scientific research cited in articles?

Reports should link the original paper, DOI, preprint, or research record beside the relevant claim. Label institutional press releases and secondary reporting separately. ScienceDaily and Phys.org can help locate a story but are not substitutes for checking its underlying study. If only a secondary source was consulted, disclose that limitation.

What is the correction policy if an error or inaccuracy is detected?

Report a suspected error through Contact Us with the page URL, claim, and supporting source. After checking the issue, material factual corrections should include a dated note explaining what changed and why. An updated edition should be identified as an update rather than silently added as another version. This independent project does not promise immediate review or a fixed response time.

How can readers report an inaccuracy or submit feedback?

Readers are encouraged to reach out through our contact page with specific citations or evidence regarding potential inaccuracies, enabling our editorial desk to review and rectify issues promptly.

Share your scientific research with our readers

Are you a researcher, educator, or science communicator looking to reach a broader audience? We welcome guest contributions that adhere to our standards of accuracy and clarity. Reach out to our editorial desk today to propose your story or submit your draft.